Professional Practice

Report writing, disclosure requirements, legal aspects, professional ethics, and laboratory certification for gemmologists.

By Fabian Moor Last updated
ethics market/disclosure reports certification legal CIBJO

Introduction

Professional gemmological practice is defined not only by technical competence but
by the ethical and legal obligations that govern how findings are communicated and
how conflicts of interest are managed. A gemmologist valuing a stone for a client
who is simultaneously a potential buyer must disclose that commercial relationship;
failure to do so breaches Gem-A's Code of Ethics and may constitute fraud under
consumer-protection legislation in multiple jurisdictions. [1]
[2] The distinction between identification (a technical
finding) and valuation (a market opinion) is equally critical: each carries its
own liability exposure, documentation standard, and scope of competence. CIBJO
nomenclature provides the international baseline for report language, ensuring that
terms such as "natural", "synthetic", and "treated" carry consistent meanings across
borders. [3] For an FGA member, the practical
implication is clear: every report issued should state its purpose, scope, and
limitations, and any commission relationship between the gemmologist and a buyer or
seller must be disclosed in writing before the report is relied upon.

Report Writing

Gemmological reports must be accurate, clear, and legally defensible. Whether
a brief identification note or a full laboratory report, certain standards
apply.

Report Structure

A full gemmological report typically includes:

  1. Header: Laboratory name, report number, date
  2. Item description: Weight, dimensions, shape, cut
  3. Identification: Species, variety, natural/synthetic
  4. Properties measured: RI, SG, optic character
  5. Inclusions/features: Brief description of significant features
  6. Treatment status: Detected treatments or "none detected"
  7. Origin (if determined): Geographic origin
  8. Comments: Additional relevant information
  9. Photographs: Scaled image of the item
  10. Limitations: Scope of examination stated

Report Language

Use precise, standardised terminology:

  • CIBJO Blue Books: International nomenclature standards [3]
  • ISO standards: Where applicable [4]
  • Avoid subjective terms: "Beautiful" is not scientific
  • Qualify opinions: "Consistent with...", "Evidence suggests..."
  • State uncertainty: If results are inconclusive, say so

Description vs Opinion

Distinguish clearly between:

  • Observations: Objective measurements and features
  • Interpretations: What observations mean
  • Opinions: Professional judgements

Example:

  • Observation: "RI 1.544-1.553, uniaxial positive"
  • Interpretation: "Consistent with natural quartz"
  • Opinion: "Stone identified as natural amethyst"

Standard Terminology (CIBJO) [3]

CIBJO (Confédération Internationale de la Bijouterie, Joaillerie, Orfèvrerie des
Diamants, Perles et Pierres) sets international nomenclature standards.

Key CIBJO Terms

Term Definition Notes
Natural Formed in nature without human intervention Excludes cultured pearls
Synthetic Man-made, same composition as natural Must be disclosed
Imitation/Simulant Resembles but different composition Must be disclosed
Treated Natural material that has been enhanced Specifics must be disclosed
Composite/Assembled Multiple parts joined together Must be disclosed

Treatment Terminology

Abbreviation Meaning Gems
H Heat treated Corundum, tanzanite, zircon
H(a) Heat with residual foreign substances Heated with borax
H(b) Beryllium diffusion treated Sapphire (lattice diffusion)
O Oiling/resin Emerald
F Fissure/fracture filled Ruby, diamond
D Dyed Coral, jade, agate
C Coated Topaz, quartz
I Impregnated Turquoise, opal
R Irradiated Topaz, diamond

Disclosure Requirements

Disclosure of treatments, synthetics, and simulants is both an ethical obligation
and often a legal requirement.

What Must Be Disclosed

Always disclose:

  • Synthetic or laboratory-grown status
  • All treatments that affect durability (filling, coating)
  • All treatments that affect appearance (heating, diffusion)
  • Composite or assembled nature

Disclosure timing:

  • Before sale is completed
  • In writing for significant transactions
  • On any laboratory report

How to Disclose

Disclosure should be:

  • Clear: Use plain language the buyer understands
  • Prominent: Not hidden in fine print
  • Documented: Written record for significant sales
  • Complete: Include all relevant treatments
  • Accurate: Based on testing, not assumptions

Non-Disclosure Consequences

Failure to disclose can result in:

  • Consumer protection violations
  • Trade descriptions act breaches
  • Professional sanctions
  • Civil liability (rescission, damages)
  • Criminal prosecution in serious cases
  • Reputation damage

Disclosure Obligations

Professional Ethics

Ethical practice underpins the trust that clients, trade, and public place in
professional gemmologists.

Core Ethical Principles

Conflicts of Interest

Potential conflicts must be identified and managed:

  • Financial interest: Ownership of items being appraised
  • Commercial pressure: Pressure to provide favourable reports
  • Relationship bias: Friends, family, regular clients
  • Referral fees: Payments for directing business

Disclose conflicts and decline work where objectivity cannot be maintained.

Professional Body Codes

Professional organisations maintain codes of conduct:

  • Gem-A: Code of Ethics for members [1]
  • GIA: Alumni Code of Ethics [10]
  • AGTA: Member Standards
  • National associations: Jurisdiction-specific codes

Violation may result in sanctions including membership revocation.

Laboratory Certification

Major gemmological laboratories provide authoritative identification and grading
reports. Understanding laboratory services and limitations is essential.

Major Laboratories

Laboratory Headquarters Specialties
GIA (Gemological Institute of America) USA Diamond grading, education
Gübelin Gem Lab Switzerland Coloured stones, inclusions research
SSEF Switzerland Origin determination, pearls
AGL (American Gemological Laboratories) USA Coloured stones
GRS (GemResearch Swisslab) Switzerland Origin, quality reports
Lotus Gemology Thailand Coloured stones, treatments
DSEF German Foundation Germany Coloured stones, pearls

Report Types

Laboratories offer various report levels:

  • Identification report: Basic species/variety identification
  • Origin report: Geographic origin determination
  • Quality/grading report: Colour, clarity, cut assessment
  • Treatment report: Detailed treatment analysis
  • Melee services: Screening for synthetics/simulants

Interpreting Laboratory Reports

When reading laboratory reports:

  • Check report date (treatments may have occurred since)
  • Understand terminology used
  • Note any qualifications or limitations
  • Verify authenticity (online verification services)
  • Recognise that labs may disagree

When to Recommend Laboratory Testing

Refer to laboratories for:

  • High-value stones where certification adds value
  • Suspected treatments requiring advanced testing
  • Origin determination (trace element analysis)
  • Natural vs synthetic confirmation for diamonds
  • Legal disputes requiring authoritative documentation

Continuing Professional Development

Documentation Best Practices

Record Keeping

Maintain thorough records:

  • Test results and observations
  • Equipment calibration records
  • Client information (confidential)
  • Copies of issued reports
  • Photographs of examined items

Retain records according to legal requirements (typically 6+ years). [12]

Photographic Documentation

Photographic records should include:

  • Standard orientation views
  • Scale reference in image
  • Consistent lighting
  • Inclusion photography through microscope
  • Date and item reference

Quality Assurance

Implement quality controls:

  • Regular equipment calibration
  • Reference stone verification
  • Peer review of difficult cases
  • Procedure documentation
  • Error tracking and correction

References

  1. 1. Gem-A (2019). Gem-A Code of Ethics for Members. Gemmological Association of Great Britain. Retrieved 2026-05-11, from https://gem-a.com/about/membership/code-of-ethics
  2. 2. Federal Trade Commission (2018). Guides for the Jewelry, Precious Metals, and Pewter Industries. US Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/guides-jewelry-precious-metals-pewter-industries.
  3. 3. CIBJO (2020). The Gemstone Book: CIBJO Blue Book. World Jewellery Confederation (CIBJO). https://cibjo.org/download/cibjo-standards/.
  4. 4. International Organization for Standardization (2015). ISO 18323:2015 — Jewellery: Consumer Confidence in the Jewellery Industry. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/62337.html.
  5. 5. UK Parliament (2008). Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277). HMSO. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277.
  6. 6. UK Parliament (2015). Consumer Rights Act 2015. HMSO. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15.
  7. 7. European Parliament and Council (2005). Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning Unfair Business-to-Consumer Commercial Practices. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32005L0029.
  8. 8. Australian Government (2010). Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010). https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2020C00226.
  9. 9. UK Ministry of Justice (2023). Civil Procedure Rules Part 35: Experts and Assessors. HMSO. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part35.
  10. 10. Gemological Institute of America (2020). GIA Alumni Association Code of Ethics. Gemological Institute of America. Retrieved 2026-05-11, from https://www.gia.edu/alumni
  11. 11. Gem-A (2021). Continuing Professional Development Policy. Gemmological Association of Great Britain. Retrieved 2026-05-11, from https://gem-a.com/about/membership/cpd
  12. 12. UK Parliament (1980). Limitation Act 1980. HMSO. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58.