The Microscope
Using the gemmological microscope for inclusion study, illumination techniques, and immersion methods to identify gems and detect treatments.
Introduction
The gemmological microscope is the primary tool for studying inclusions, growth features,
and signs of treatment, and is the standard instrument for separating natural from synthetic
gems and detecting many enhancements. A binocular stereo microscope with variable magnification
of 10×–45× is the standard configuration; darkfield illumination (light entering from the
sides against a dark background) is used for most inclusion observation, while brightfield
(transmitted) illumination reveals colour zoning and growth patterns.
Magnifications of 30×–40× cover most routine work. At 10× (loupe equivalent), overall
clarity and obvious inclusions are assessed; at 60×, fine surface features and micro-inclusions
become visible. Immersion in a liquid of similar RI to the stone eliminates surface
reflections and greatly improves the visibility of internal features: benzyl benzoate
(RI 1.57) suits quartz and beryl; di-iodomethane (RI 1.74) suits corundum and spinel.
[1] Synthetic ruby produced by the Verneuil (flame-fusion) method
is identified by curved growth striae and spherical gas bubbles visible at 30×–40×, features
absent from natural ruby.
Microscope Types
Several microscope configurations are used in gemmology:
Stereo Microscope
The standard gemmological microscope:
- Binocular viewing: Comfortable, natural depth perception
- Variable magnification: Usually 10× to 45×
- Working distance: Adequate space for manipulation
- Various illumination options: Darkfield, brightfield, fibre-optic
Compound Microscope
Higher magnification for detailed work:
- Higher power: 100× to 400×
- Thinner depth of field: More difficult to use
- Specific applications: Examining very fine inclusions
- Not standard for routine gemmology
Magnification Ranges
Different magnifications serve different purposes:
| Magnification | Application | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 10× | Standard loupe magnification; overview examination | FGA/GIA grading standard |
| 20× | General inclusion observation | Good balance of magnification and field |
| 30-40× | Detailed inclusion study | Most routine microscopy |
| 50-60× | Fine details, surface features | Reduced field of view |
| 100×+ | Specific investigations | Rarely needed; difficult to use |
Illumination Techniques
Different lighting reveals different features:
| Technique | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Darkfield | Light from sides; inclusions bright against dark background | Most inclusions, three-phase, silk |
| Brightfield | Light from below; transmitted through gem | Colour zoning, growth patterns, fingerprints |
| Fibre-optic | Directed beam for pinpoint illumination | Individual inclusions, surface features |
| Overhead | Reflected light from above | Surface features, coatings, wear |
| Polarised | Light through crossed polars | Strain, twinning, birefringence |
Darkfield Illumination
The most commonly used technique. [2]
How It Works
Light enters from the sides rather than directly below:
- Background appears dark
- Inclusions scatter light and appear bright
- Excellent contrast for most internal features
- Standard setup for routine examination
What It Reveals
- Crystal inclusions (bright points or shapes)
- Silk and needle inclusions
- Gas bubbles
- Fractures and feathers
- Fingerprints (healed fractures)
- Three-phase inclusions
Brightfield and Other Techniques
Alternative illumination for specific observations:
Brightfield
Light transmitted directly through the stone:
- Colour zoning: Visible as bands or areas of different colour
- Growth patterns: Hexagonal zoning in corundum
- Colour concentration: Around fractures or surfaces
- Best for: Transparent stones with colour variations
Fibre-Optic Illumination
Directed light for specific features:
- Pinpoint individual inclusions
- Trace fractures and feathers
- Examine drill holes
- Light difficult-to-reach areas
Oblique and Shadow Illumination
Light at steep angles:
- Enhances surface texture
- Reveals polish quality
- Shows surface-reaching features
- Highlights laser drill holes
Immersion Technique
Immersing the gem in a liquid of similar RI reduces surface reflections and reveals
internal features more clearly.
Common Immersion Liquids {cite:read-2014-gemmology}
| Liquid | RI | Best For | Safety Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distilled water | 1.33 | Basic immersion; safe for all gems | Safe |
| Liquid paraffin (also almond oil and baby oil) | 1.47 | General purpose; low-RI materials | Safe; readily available |
| Clove oil | 1.54 | General purpose | Pleasant odour; low toxicity |
| Benzyl benzoate | 1.57 | Quartz, beryl, feldspar | Low toxicity |
| 1-bromonaphthalene (monobromonaphthalene) | 1.66 | Tourmaline, spodumene, diopside | Lab use only; avoid skin contact |
| Di-iodomethane (methylene iodide) | 1.74 | Corundum, spinel, garnet | Toxic; handle with care; store in dark bottles |
Immersion Observations
Immersion reveals:
- Colour zoning: Much clearer than in air
- Growth patterns: Curved (synthetic) vs angular (natural)
- Surface treatments: Diffusion layers
- Internal features: Without surface reflections
Immersion Warning
Diagnostic Inclusions
Certain inclusions are diagnostic for species or origin:
By Gem Species
| Gem | Characteristic Inclusions |
|---|---|
| Corundum | Silk (rutile needles), fingerprints, hexagonal zoning |
| Emerald | Three-phase inclusions (Colombian), jardín, calcite [3] |
| Spinel | Octahedral crystals, fingerprints, often cleaner than corundum |
| Tourmaline | Growth tubes, needles, colour zoning |
| Peridot | Lily pads (stress discs around chromite) |
| Topaz | Two-phase inclusions, growth tubes |
Natural vs Synthetic
Key differences to look for:
- Natural: Irregular growth, natural crystal inclusions
- Flame fusion: Gas bubbles, curved striae
- Flux synthetic: Flux inclusions, platinum crystals
- Hydrothermal: Seed plate, chevron patterns
Treatment Detection
The microscope is the primary tool for treatment detection:
- Heat treatment: Altered silk, stress fractures, melted inclusions
- Fracture filling: Flash effect, gas bubbles in filler
- Lead glass filling: Flash effect, trapped bubbles
- Beryllium diffusion: Colour concentration at facet junctions
- Laser drilling: Thin tubes reaching inclusions
- Coating: Iridescence, colour concentration at surface
References
- ↑ 1. Read, P. (2014). Gemmology (3 ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0-08-050722-4. DOI: 10.4324/9780080507224.
- ↑ 2. Anderson, B. (1990). Gem Testing (10 ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
- ↑ 3. Gubelin, E.; Koivula, J. (1986). Photoatlas of Inclusions in Gemstones. ABC Edition. ISBN: 978-3-85504-027-6.